Quantitative benchmark computations of two‐dimensional bubble dynamics

By S. Hysing, Stefan Turek, Dmitri Kuzmin, N. Parolini, Erik Burman, Sashikumaar Ganesan, Lutz Tobiska. 2009

608 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b25a407025c9f55f515bef435a502c3e808be54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Mostafa Safdari Shadloo
2. Stéphane Popinet

In Computational Mechanics

1. Mostafa Safdari Shadloo
2. A. Zainali
3. Nima Tofighi
4. Mehmet Yildiz
5. K. Schaake
6. Jens Klostermann
7. Rüdiger Schwarze
8. Axel Voigt

Citations in the corpus

• Numerical Models of Surface Tension (2018, methodology): “For example (Hysing et al. 2009, Featflow 2008) give reference solutions, using different numerical methods, for rising bubbles which can be reproduced accurately by other methods (Basilisk 2013, rising.c).”
• Numerical simulation of a single rising bubble by VOF with surface compression (2013, methodology): “[9], a two-dimensional computational domain with an aspect ratio x W y D 1 W 2 is employed, see Figure 1.”
• Numerical investigation of Newtonian and non-Newtonian multiphase flows using ISPH method (2013, methodology): “The center of mass and mean velocity of a bubble can be calculated as [48],”
• Benchmark computations of diffuse interface models for two‐dimensional bubble dynamics (2012, methodology): “The results in [1] show that the size of the filaments might become very small (e.”