Ill Adults: A Meta-analysis Benefits and Risks of Tight Glucose Control in Critically

By R. Wiener, D. Wiener, R. Larson. 2010

783 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7e414b815cda743aa7f0340d953e605351e358f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. V. Basevi
2. A. Classification
3. David B. Sacks
4. D. Nathan
5. M. Arnold
6. G. Bakris
7. M. S. Kirkman
8. J. Preiser

Citations in the corpus

• Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2002, background): “A meta-analysis of multiple randomized controlled trials of tight glucose control conducted 7 years later failed to identify any improved outcomes but did find an increased incidence of hypoglycemia (136).”
• American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association Consensus Statement on Inpatient Glycemic Control (2009, background): “The positive results reported in the initial studies may have been attributable to differences in measurement and reporting of BG values, selection of participants, glycemic variability, or nutritional support (12,17,84).”
• Factors Influencing the Decline in Stroke Mortality (2013, result): “This line of research is supported by trials of acute intensive glucose management that showed a reduced intensive care unit mortality and length of stay,(231) although a meta-analysis of all intensive care unit−based glucose management trials did not find a similar benefit.(232) The Insulin Resista”
• Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. (2002, background): “A meta-analysis of multiple randomized controlled trials of tight glucose control conducted 7 years later failed to identify any improved outcomes but did find an increased incidence of hypoglycemia (136).”
• A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study (2009, result): “They are also in agreement with the data of two recent meta-analyses [20, 21], which included the data of this study [8].”
• Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2013 (2012, background): “Recent trials in critically ill patients have failed to show a significant improvement in mortality with intensive glycemic control (460,461) or have even shown increased mortality risk (462).”
• Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data (2009, background): “Our meta-analysis showed a similar overall pooled estimate of effect on mortality, and similar confidence intervals, as the meta-analysis by Wiener and colleagues.(14) One important difference between these 2 reviews is our finding that the effect of intensive insulin therapy differed by ICU setting”
• Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009 (2009, background): “However, in several studies of critically ill medical patients (330,331,333), the incidence of severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose 40 mg/dl) was approximately threefold greater in intensively treated patients.”