Coherence, Diversity, and the Evolution of Capitalisms—The Institutional Complementarity Hypothesis

By R. Boyer. 2005

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy (2010, background): “Rather, they function in concert with other preexisting mechanisms (Amable, 2000; Boyer, 2005; Deeg, 2007).”
Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy (2017, background): “…respond with a limited repertoire of policy choices.26 In terms of what we find of value today, the original Regulation School literature made a distinction between the accumulation regime (how value is generated) and themode of regulation (how value is distributed and governed) (Boyer, 2005b).”
In defence of generalized Darwinism (2008, background): “In addition, there is now a growing literature on how firms may perform differently in different contexts, such as under different regulatory regimes or among different types of financial institutions (Amable 2000; Aoki 2001; Hall and Soskice 2001; Boyer 2005; Kenworthy 2006).”