The use of internal audit by Australian companies
By Jenny Goodwin-Stewart, P. Kent. 2006
273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7a5be73b9a49774131c403feee1b153134e700f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- P. Yatim
- R. Monem
- J. Solomon
- Niamh M. Brennan
- Dessalegn Getie Mihret
- Josefa Mula
- P. Kent
- Kieran James
Citations in the corpus
- Board structures and the establishment of a risk management committee by Malaysian listed firms (2010, methodology): “firms. This current study is somewhat different from that of Goodwin-Stewart and Kent (2006) in that it considers internal control is an integrated part of risk management activities.”
- What Drives TBL Reporting: Good Governance or Threat to Legitimacy? (2008, background): “As audit committees were not mandatory for Australian companies (except for the top 500), the existence of an audit committee is indicative of a company’s commitment to strong corporate governance (Goodwin-Stewart and Kent 2006).”
- Antecedents and organisational performance implications of internal audit effectiveness (2010, background): “This suggests a positive association between level of risk exposure of an organisation and internal audit effectiveness (Goodwin‐Stewart and Kent, 2006).”
- Corporate Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview (2008, background): “However, Raghunandan et al., (2001), Davidson et al., (2005), Goodwin-Stewart and Kent (2006), Gendron and Bédard (2006) and Turley and Zaman (2007) have touched on the subject to varying extents.”