An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector
By Kuan Yew Wong, Elaine Aspinwall. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2005
650 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7a2e61ae67a79076057d90a31e433dd8405c3ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Joaquín Alegre
- Thurasamy Ramayah
- Rajesh K. Singh
- Donatella Busso
- Sanjay Kumar Singh
- Shivam Gupta
- Shampy Kamboj
In Strategy and Management
- Joaquín Alegre
- José Pla‐Barber
- S. Deshmukh
- Cristina Villar
- Rajesh K. Singh
- Donatella Busso
- Sanjay Kumar Singh
- Shivam Gupta
Citations in the corpus
- Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance (2019, background): “…and exploitative innovation in SMEs rather than larger firms (Lubatkin et al., 2006) and how top management support facilitates sharing of knowledge (Lee et al., 2016; Wang & Noe, 2010; Yew Wong, 2005) for enhanced performance (Pittino, Martinez, Chirico, & Galvan, 2018; Lee et al., 2016).”
- Strategy development by SMEs for competitiveness: a review (2008, background): “The foundation of organizational competitiveness has shifted from physical and tangible resources to knowledge (Wong and Aspinwall, 2005).”
- Exploring the role of knowledge management practices on exports: A dynamic capabilities view (2014, background): “Indeed, in spite of its importance for sustainable competitiveness, in most SMEs there is an absence of systematic knowledge management (Wong & Aspinwall, 2005).”
- Interpretive structural modelling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs (2007, background): “The foundation of organisational competitiveness has shifted from physical and tangible resources to knowledge (Wong and Aspinwall, 2005).”
- Technology acceptance among micro-entrepreneurs in marginalized social strata: The case of social innovation in Bangladesh (2017, background): “Previously in the field of entrepreneurship study, the useable response rate found to be 17% (Lohrke et al., 2015), 18% (Wong and Aspinwall, 2005), and 18.8% (Jiao and Cui, 2010).”