Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation – an analysis with REMIND

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Description of the REMIND Model (Version 1.6) (2015, unknown): “, oil, coal, and gas) are further defined by decline rates and adjustment costs (Bauer et al. 2013).”
Catching two European birds with one renewable stone: Mitigating climate change and Eurozone crisis by an energy transition (2014, background): “generating a trillion $ revenue stream globally [115].”
Science and the Stock Market: Investors’ Recognition of Unburnable Carbon (2014, background): “For example, Bauer et al. (2015) suggest coal's marginal profit rate is already limited and, thereby, coal loses the least monetarily in the short term (to 2030) and long term (to 2100), as opposed to oil and gas which suffer the largest economic losses under climate change stabilization policies on”
Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century (2017, unknown): “The energy system representation differentiates between a variety of fossil, biogenic, nuclear and renewable energy resources (Bauer et al., 2012, 2016a,b; Klein et al., 2014a; Pietzcker et al., 2014a,b).”
Fossil fuel supply and climate policy: exploring the road less taken (2018, background): “Studies have examined, for example, the extent to which achieving climate protection objectives would dramatically curtail fossil fuel profits, or Brents^ (Bauer et al. 2013), and render a significant fraction of coal and unconventional oil reserves and resources Bunburnable^ (McGlade and Ekins 2015”