Tonal Pitch Space

By F. Lerdahl. 2001

352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c76eca0ba97ef9f4c2fba8b56124f31d35862667

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. E. G. Schellenberg
2. G. Schellenberg
3. Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis
4. Swathi Swaminathan
5. Safia Khalil

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. G. Schellenberg
2. E. G. Schellenberg
3. Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis

In Signal Processing

1. G. Schellenberg
2. E. G. Schellenberg
3. Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis

Citations in the corpus

• A Model of Melodic Expectation (2005, methodology): “Via the parameter of mobility, the present model successfully addresses the pitch repetition issues that are problematic in Lerdahl (2001).”
• Long-Term Positive Associations between Music Lessons and IQ. (2006, background): “Music has rules of order that are similar to those of syntax in language (Koelsch, 2005; Lerdahl, 2001; Lerdahl & Jackendoff, 1983; Patel, 2003), and similar mechanisms are likely to be involved in the acquisition of musical and linguistic knowledge (McMullen & Saffran, 2004).”