Automatic construction of a large-scale and accurate drug-side-effect association knowledge base from biomedical literature

By Rong Xu, QuanQiu Wang. 2014

56 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Systems approaches to studying drug-side-effect (drug-SE) associations are emerging as an active research area for drug target discovery, drug repositioning, and drug toxicity prediction. However, currently available drug-SE association databases are far from being complete. Herein, in an effort to increase the data completeness of current drug-SE relationship resources, we present an automatic learning approach to accurately extract drug-SE pairs from the vast amount of published biomedical literature, a rich knowledge source of side effect information for commercial, experimental, and even failed drugs. For the text corpus, we used 119,085,682 MEDLINE sentences and their parse trees. We used known drug-SE associations derived from US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels as prior knowledge to find relevant sentences and parse trees. We extracted syntactic patterns associated with drug-SE pairs from the resulting set of parse trees. We developed pattern-ranking algorithms to prioritize drug-SE-specific patterns. We then selected a set of patterns with both high precisions and recalls in order to extract drug-SE pairs from the entire MEDLINE. In total, we extracted 38,871 drug-SE pairs from MEDLINE using the learned patterns, the majority of which have not been captured in FDA drug labels to date. On average, our knowledge-driven pattern-learning approach in extracting drug-SE pairs from MEDLINE has achieved a precision of 0.833, a recall of 0.407, and an F1 of 0.545. We compared our approach to a support vector machine (SVM)-based machine learning and a co-occurrence statistics-based approach. We show that the pattern-learning approach is largely complementary to the SVM- and co-occurrence-based approaches with significantly higher precision and F1 but lower recall. We demonstrated by correlation analysis that the extracted drug side effects correlate positively with both drug targets, metabolism, and indications.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

In Molecular Biology

In Pharmacology

Citations in the corpus

The SIDER database of drugs and side effects (2015, methodology): “As a further use case, SIDER has been used as the benchmarking set for text-mining methods that extract ADR data from the literature (4,11), and other databases have incorporated data from SIDER.”
Joint Models for Extracting Adverse Drug Events from Biomedical Text (2016, methodology): “Other approaches use weaklysupervised techniques such as bootstrapping, whose performance depends on seed patterns [Xu and Wang, 2014].”