Impacts of fisheries bycatch on loggerhead turtles worldwide inferred from reproductive value analyses

By Bryan P. Wallace, S. Heppell, Rebecca Lewison, S. Kelez, LB Crowder. 2008

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c767c5ab5d575679b2ba96e71f83f147216f7674

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. P. Casale
2. S. Cooke
3. Rebecca Lewison
4. S. Hinch
5. G. Raby
6. L. Komoroske
7. Andrew J. Read
8. Bryan P. Wallace

Citations in the corpus

• Impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine turtle populations worldwide: toward conservation and research priorities (2013, methodology): “For example, Wallace et al. (2008) showed that body sizes of loggerheads taken as bycatch in Mediterranean longlines varied according to hook sizes and set depths, indicating that within the category of longline gear, relative bycatch impacts depended on target species and associated gear…”
• Stable isotopes confirm a foraging dichotomy in juvenile loggerhead sea turtles (2010, background): “Complimentary efforts revealing intra-population phenotypic variation provide valuable insight into variation in life history and demographic traits required to foster practical conservation management (Wallace et al., 2008; NMFS and USFWS, 2009).”
• Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals (2014, background): “Resulting species declines have been documented, highlighting the need for management intervention (Hall, 1998; Tuck et al., 2001; Lewison et al., 2004b; Wallace et al., 2008).”
• Addressing fisheries bycatch in a changing world (2015, background): “…reproductive values (Fisher, 1930; Keyfitz and Caswell, 2005), researchers can apply this knowledge to ascertain which fisheries and gear are likely to result in the bycatch that can have the largest negative consequences on population growth (Alfaro Shigueto et al., 2008; Wallace et al., 2008).”
• Fine-scale distribution of juvenile Atlantic and Mediterranean loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Mediterranean Sea (2014, background): “The impact of fisheries bycatch depends on habitat use, type of fishing gear, fishing effort, abundance of the affected populations and origin of these populations (Wallace et al. 2008).”
• Sea turtle by‐catch in the Mediterranean (2011, background): “Therefore, information about the size of turtles affected by interaction with fisheries is of interest for conservation (Wallace et al. 2008).”
• Large‐scale movements and high‐use areas of western Pacific leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea (2011, background): “This is a high rate of documented anthropogenic mortality for a longlived species, of particular concern given that these were breeding adults and therefore of high reproductive value to the population (see Wallace et al. 2008).”
• Why study bycatch? An introduction to the Theme Section on fisheries bycatch (2008, background): “In another example, Wallace et al. (2008) noted that added mortalities at different life stages have unequal consequences for populations.”