Psychosomatic: Feminism and the Neurological Body

By E. A. Wilson. 2004

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Neurology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c767ba6ad1a251d4fda411f9cd2985659c072fba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Neurology

1. L. Blackman
2. Felicity Callard
3. D. Fitzgerald
4. Nikolas Rose

In Philosophy

1. Nikolas Rose
2. L. Blackman
3. Felicity Callard
4. D. Fitzgerald
5. M. Wetherell

Citations in the corpus

• Reinventing psychological matters: the importance of the suggestive realm of Tarde's ontology (2007, background): “The retreat to the singular body to explain the performative force of practices has led cultural theorists like Brennan (2004), Wilson (2004), Massumi (2002) and Connolly (2002) to the neuro-hormonal body, the nervous system, the perceptual system and the brain.”
• Rethinking Interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences (2015, background): “…check out the literature on ‘material feminism’ (see Alaimo and Hekman 2008), and subsequent engagement with the work of cultural theorist Elizabeth Wilson (2004) and Donna Haraway (1997), one of the leading lights in science and technology studies (STS), DF came to think very differently about…”
• Trauma Theory Without Feminism? Evaluating Contemporary Understandings of Traumatized Women (2013, unknown): “Courtois, C. A. (2004).”
• The Human Sciences in a Biological Age (2013, background): “…theorists and feminist philosophers have come to realize that it is not reactionary to recognize the reality of our fleshly nature, and to examine the possibilities and constraints that flow from it (Blackman, 2008, 2010; Braidotti, 2002; Grosz, 1994; Massumi, 2002; Thrift, 2007; Wilson, 2004b).”
• Affect, Relationality and the `Problem of Personality' (2008, background): “This redistribution of a particular model of social influence is one that many contemporary authors assume in their writings, and prevents a serious engagement with its implications in relation to affect and relationality (see Brennan, 2004; Connolly, 2002; Massumi, 2002; Wilson, 2004).”