Optimal Jamming Attacks and Network Defense Policies in Wireless Sensor Networks

By Mingyan Li, Iordanis Koutsopoulos, Radha Poovendran. IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, 2007

309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A survey on jamming attacks and countermeasures in WSNs (2009, background): “A significant number of research works suggest addressing jamming attacks utilizing hardware used in contemporary WSNs [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31], while other works suggest new design requirements of nodes that can effectively defend jamming attacks [32].”
Sensor network security: a survey (2009, background): “in [73] study controllable jamming attacks in WSNs, which are easy to launch and difficult to detect and confront.”
Jamming and anti-jamming techniques in wireless networks: a survey (2014, background): “Li et al (2007) show that the probability of jamming can be made high if the attacker is aware of the networkstrategy as well as its transmission powers.”
Physical-Layer Security of 5G Wireless Networks for IoT: Challenges and Opportunities (2019, background): “Meanwhile, these countermeasures to jamming attacks can be categorized in jamming detection techniques [45], reactive countermeasures [46], and proactive countermeasures [47].”
Cyber security in the Smart Grid: Survey and challenges (2013, background): “…communication networks, because of the packet-switched network architecture for TCP/IP, the literature in general modeled the impact of DoS attacks at the packet level (e.g., packet loss [72] and the number of corrupted packets [69]) or at the network level (e.g., network throughput [73]).”