A survey on jamming attacks and countermeasures in WSNs
By Aristides Mpitziopoulos, Damianos Gavalas, Charalampos Konstantopoulos, Grammati E. Pantziou. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2009
549 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59c68cbbba91080240779d57255db742a1a6495e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Xianbin Wang
- Mohsen Guizani
- Ala Al-Fuqaha
- Arsalan Mosenia
- Mohammad Ali Salahuddin
- Alvin S. Lim
- Niraj Kumar Jha
- Lajos Hanzo
Citations in the corpus
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Security (2019, background): “1) Jamming attacks: Jamming attacks can be considered as a special case of DoS attacks, which are defined as any event that diminishes or eradicates a network’s capacity to execute its expected function [119]–[121].”
- A Comprehensive Study of Security of Internet-of-Things (2017, background): “Several research efforts have examined the possibility and effectiveness of launching DoS attacks against various transmission protocols, including Bluetooth [64], ZigBee [65], and 6LowPan [66].”
- Smart Cities: A Survey on Data Management, Security, and Enabling Technologies (2017, background): “TABLE XII SECURITY THREATS AND COUNTERMEASURES [312], [314], [315], [320], [324]–[343]”
- A Survey on Wireless Security: Technical Challenges, Recent Advances, and Future Trends (2015, background): “Moreover, a malicious node in wireless networks can readily generate intentional interference for disrupting the d ata communications between legitimate users, which is referre d to as a jamming attack (also known as DoS attack) [72].”
- Jamming Attacks and Anti-Jamming Strategies in Wireless Networks: A Comprehensive Survey (2021, background): “The experimental results show that, for a given signal-to-jamming ratio (SJR), a jammer with T ∈ [20, 40] is least destructive (yielding highest EVM), while a jammer with T ∈ [160, 200] is most destructive (yielding lowest EVM).”
- Denial of Service Attacks in Wireless Networks: The Case of Jammers (2011, methodology): “Further reading: A reader interested in jamming attacks on wireless sensor networks can further refer to the work by Mpitziopoulos et al [61].”
- Jamming and anti-jamming techniques in wireless networks: a survey (2014, background): “Keywords: Jamming, anti-jamming, wireless networks, classification of jammers, placement of jammers, localizing jammers, detection of jammers, countermeasure for jamming.”