The application of acceptance criteria to results of Thellier palaeointensity experiments performed on samples with pseudo-single-domain-like characteristics

62 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Analyzing absolute paleointensity determinations: Acceptance criteria and the software ThellierTool4.0 (2004, background): “…of the experimental data, a number of additional parameters and criteria were suggested by several authors [e.g., Prévot et al., 1985; Aitken et al., 1988; Tauxe, 1998; Selkin and Tauxe, 2000; Riisager and Riisager, 2001; Laj et al., 2002; Biggin and Thomas, 2003; Kissel and Laj, 2004].”
The intensity of the geomagnetic field in the late-Archaean: new measurements and an analysis of the updated IAGA palaeointensity database (2009, methodology): “Produced using the Thellier method incorporating pTRM checks—this method certainly does not guarantee that the determination is accurate (Biggin and Thomas, 2003a, b) but it does reduce the likelihood of it being biased by alteration.”
A simple test for the presence of multidomain behavior during paleointensity experiments (2011, background): “6.3. Other Methods of Calculating Curvature [29] Attempts have been made to quantify the curvature of dataonanAraiplot, butwithvaryingorlimited success.Both Coe et al. [1978] and Biggin and Thomas [2003] defined the curvature of data as the maximum percentage deviation of the slope of any segment ”