Analyzing absolute paleointensity determinations: Acceptance criteria and the software ThellierTool4.0

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The intensity of the geomagnetic field in the late-Archaean: new measurements and an analysis of the updated IAGA palaeointensity database (2009, methodology): “To ensure this was not the case here, we analysed the results of the pTRM tail checks and used the strict criteria outlined for ‘Class A’ results by Leonhardt et al. (2004) to exclude any samples which may be subject to MD behaviour.”
A simple test for the presence of multidomain behavior during paleointensity experiments (2011, methodology): “... components of magnetization.Using the best‐fits reported, the effects of applying several previously published selection criteriahavebeeninvestigated.Fivesetsofselectioncriteriawere testedonthisdataset:SELCRIT2fromBigginetal.[2007]isa modification of the criteria proposed by Selkin and Tauxe [20”
On improving the selection of Thellier‐type paleointensity data (2014, background): “2 2004], SELCRIT2 [Biggin et al., 2007], and the ThellierTool A and B criteria sets [Leonhardt et al., 2004] (herein referred to as TTA and TTB, respectively).”