Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: the case of Brazil
By Pedro Henrique Santin Brancalion, D. Schweizer, Ulysse Gaudaré, J. Mangueira, Fernando Henrique Franco Lamonato, F. Farah, A. Nave, R. Rodrigues. 2016
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1610c7d7f563763c363a18f1af03013c33060357
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- A landscape approach for cost‐effective large‐scale forest restoration (2018, background): “The first relates to the chances of land 357 abandonment, since conservation and restoration of riparian buffers in Brazil is mandatory 358 (Brancalion et al. 2016), while also showing restriction to mechanization related to soil flooding 359 and abrupt changes in terrain.”
- Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: A global review (2020, background): “Even though our review shows the predominance of non-chemical control, a significant amount of areas under restoration, especially in tropical regions, have been managed with herbicides (Brancalion et al., 2016; Wagner et al., 2017).”