Design, integration, and field evaluation of a robotic apple harvester
By Abhisesh Silwal, J. Davidson, Manoj Karkee, C. Mo, Qin Zhang, Karen Lewis. J. Field Robotics, 2017
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6eaf8c5b6e4a8d850f6ecb4b41639bfec4cf20e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Development of a sweet pepper harvesting robot (2020, methodology): “An apple harvester (Silwal et al., 2017) tested in a commercial orchard in Washington State evaluated performance for 150 fruits with no details on how many trees this included and/or timing of the tests.”
- IoT, Big Data, and Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture and Food Industry (2020, unknown): “Silwal, et al. [47] reported the design, integration, and field evaluation of a robotic apple harvester able to detect and pick 84% of the apples with an average picking time of 6 seconds per fruit.”
- System Design and Control of an Apple Harvesting Robot (2020, unknown): “For both robotic systems reported in [12] and [15], a 7 DOF manipulator is required to approach the fruit.”
- An autonomous strawberry‐harvesting robot: Design, development, integration, and field evaluation (2019, methodology): “, 2017) or without adding the perception time (Silwal et al., 2017).”
- Recognition and Localization Methods for Vision-Based Fruit Picking Robots: A Review (2020, background): “Machine vision-based harvesting robots should have the ability to sense and adapt to different crop types or environmental changes (Zhao et al., 2016; Silwal et al., 2017), collect information, detect targets, and learn autonomously.”