Evaluation of the Laser-relascope

52 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Estimation of stem volume using laser scanning-based canopy height metrics (2006, background): “In the case of fi eld measurements, new equipment and the optimization of measurements in different stands have been proposed (e.g. Kalliovirta et al. , 2005 ; Mehtätalo and Kangas, 2005 ).”
Calibrating fixed- and mixed-effects taper equations (2011, background): “13 cm for measuring diameters (Parker and Matney, 1999; Williams et al., 1999; Kalliovirta et al., 2004).”
Nonparametric estimation of stem volume using airborne laser scanning, aerial photography, and stand-register data (2006, methodology): “Most of the methods applied have been based on remote sensing imagery, although some work has also focused on fieldwork, such as the registering of silvicultural operations, optimization of measurements, and new measurement equipment (Hyvönen and Korhonen 2003; Kalliovirta et al. 2005; Mehtätalo and”
Assessing Precision in Conventional Field Measurements of Individual Tree Attributes (2017, methodology): “6 cm (standard error) with the laser-relascope [47], and from 0.”
Automatic Stem Mapping Using Single-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanning (2012, methodology): “In [20], the laser relascope is used to measure the trunk locations relative to the plot center.”