A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada
By K. Harrison. 2012
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6c1bed9c6bb3fa93b88ba1bcbb2c4bff576c230
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Jessica F. Green
- Adam B. Jaffe
- T. Sterner
- C. Mitchell
- E. Somanathan
- Juan-Pablo Montero
- R. Denniss
- B. Rabe
Citations in the corpus
- National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “Harrison ( 2012 ) illustrates this with respect to 9 environmental tax reform in Canada .”
- Salience of Carbon Taxes in the Gasoline Market (2015, unknown): “DESIGN OF THE BC CARBON TAX The announcement that BC was introducing a carbon tax came as a surprise to the vast majority of residents (Harrison, 2012).”
- Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies (2018, background): “This challenge is often magnified in public debates about such policies: in their public-facing campaigns to discredit such policies, opposing interest groups can easily exploit the public’s weak valuation of climate benefits and doubts about the policy’s effectiveness, as exemplified by case studie”
- Carbon tax and revenue recycling: Impacts on households in British Columbia (2015, unknown): “In fact, Harrison and Peet (2012) explain the large variety in local responses to the introduction of the BC carbon tax in 2008 was dictated by the public perception of winners and losers from the regulation rather than evidence of the actual distribution of costs.”
- Jobs and climate policy: Evidence from British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax (2017, background): “The announcement came as a surprise to many, including members of his own party (Harrison, 2012).”
- Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses (2021, background): “Australia, the United States and Canada, which are all global leaders in per capita emissions, have had fierce political fights over carbon pricing (Harrison 2012, Mildenberger 2020, Mildenberger and Stokes 2020).”
- Public Attitudes toward Climate Science and Climate Policy in Federal Systems: Canada and the United States Compared† (2012, background): “…2008) and in the ongoing stalemate regarding cap and trade policy in both nations, important political obstacles have prevented the national governments in both federations from moving forward with market-based instruments for climate policy (see for instance, Harrison, 2012; Rabe & Borick, 2012).”