Adapting the CHEMTAX method for assessing phytoplankton taxonomic composition in Southeastern U.S. estuaries

By A. Lewitus, D. White, R. G. Tymowski, M. E. Geesey, Sabrina N. Hymel, P. Noble. 2005

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6a2f9fa24870a34cc4b3609dea7f28c87c0b42a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. N. Dijkman
2. J. Kromkamp
3. Maria-José Caramujo
4. Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho

In Oceanography

1. N. Dijkman
2. J. Kromkamp
3. Maria-José Caramujo
4. Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho

Citations in the corpus

• Optical proxy for phytoplankton biomass in the absence of photophysiology: Rethinking the absorption line height (2013, background): “With few exceptions, pigments can be used as a taxonomic tool; the basis for the software programCHEMTAX (Mackey et al., 1996) that discriminates community composition from pigment composition analysis (Kozlowski et al., 2011; Lewitus et al., 2005; Wright et al., 1996).”
• Phospholipid-derived fatty acids as chemotaxonomic markers for phytoplankton: application for inferring phytoplankton composition (2006, methodology): “Lewitus et al. (2005) found that results improved significantly when the biomarker composition of estuarine species was used to estimate the group composition from pigment data in an estuary compared to using the biomarker composition published by Mackey et al. (1996), which was based…”