The rebound effect : some empirical evidence from India

By J. Roy. 2000

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c680ea963027fd731ad58b99b1a336d22a304539

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency (2007, background): “Roy (2000) reports the results of a government programme that freely distributed solar-charged battery lamps to a rural village in India.”
ENERGY REBOUND AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A REVIEW OF THE MAIN ISSUES AND RESEARCH NEEDS (2009, background): “Tracing indirect effects with the tools of microeconomics, however, proves to be extremely difficult [26,31].”
An empirical study of direct rebound effect for passenger transport in urban China (2012, background): “An example of the few empirical studies conducted in the context of developing countries is Roy (2000), who reported a very high rebound effect for transport in India.”
What if consumers decided to all 'go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions (2013, unknown): “One might expect that since there is a trade-oﬀ between direct and indirect eﬀects, and direct eﬀects have been observed to diminish with rising incomes that indirect rebound eﬀects may increase with rising income levels (Baker et al., 1989; Milne and Boardman, 2000; Roy, 2000).”
Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency (2009, background): “Instead, the empirical results vary widely between different sectors, countries and time periods and are sensitive to minor changes in econometric specification (Norsworthy et al., 1979; Roy 2000; Sanstad et al., 2006; Welsch and Ochsen, 2005).”
Willingness to Pay for Eco‐Certified Refurbished Products: The Effects of Environmental Attitudes and Knowledge (2016, background): “Rebound effects are product (Murray 2013) and country specific (e.g., as a function of unmet demand) (Roy 2000).”
Renewable Energy in the Context of Sustainable Development (2011, background): “, energy consumption per unit of GDP) observed over time in almost all regions, declines in energy intensity historically often have been outpaced by economic growth and hence have proved insuffi cient to achieve actual reductions in energy use (Roy, 2000).”
An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs (2008, background): “…been conducted on the rebound effect; these have focused on theoretical and empirical aspects (Lovins, 1988; Henly et al., 1988; Greene, 1992; Berkhout et al., 2000; Reinhard and Peter, 2000; Roy, 2000; Binswanger, 2001; Bentzen, 2004; Sorrell and Dimitropoulos, in press; Brannlund et al., 2007).”
Consumer End-Use Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects (2014, background): “In India, Roy (97) found mixed evidence of the rebound effect: When the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy gave rural households free solar photovoltaic lanterns as a means to reduce kerosene lamp consumption, lighting demand increased from 2 h per day to 4–6 h per day, and kerosene lamps were sti”