The mirror test

By G. Gallup, James R. Anderson, Daniel J. Shillito. 2002

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Can animals recognize themselves in mirrors? Gallup (1970) conducted an experimental test of this question using a relatively simple approach. Individually housed chimpanzees were confronted with a full-length mirror outside their cages for a period of 10 days. The chimpanzees initially reacted as if they were seeing another chimpanzee and engaged in a variety of social displays directed toward the reflection. These social responses waned after the first few days. Rather than continue to respond to the mirror as such, the chimpanzees began using the mirror to respond to themselves by engaging in mirror-mediated facial and bodily movements and self-directed responses such as grooming parts of the body only visible in the mirror. The transition from social to self-oriented responding gave the impression that the chimpanzees had learned to recognize themselves; i.e., that they had come to realize that their behavior was the source of the behavior being depicted in the mirror. To assess this possibility Gallup devised the mark test. Each chimpanzee was anesthetized and, while unconscious, a red mark was applied to the brow above one eye and the top half of the opposite ear. A nonodorous, nonirritant dye was used, so that upon recovery from the anesthetic the chimpanzees would have no knowledge of the marks. Observations in the absence of the mirror confirmed this as the chimpanzees rarely touched the marks. When the mirror was reinstated, however, the effect was dramatic: the chimpanzees looked at their reflection and guided their fingers to the marks on their faces that could only be seen in the mirror. In addition to touching the marks repeatedly and looking at their fingers, some even smelled their fingers.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c03e9ae94b08e77c9f6e1c0cd09f82df375347fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Stephanie D. Preston
  2. F. D. de Waal
  3. Jamil Zaki
  4. Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory
  5. Tania Singer
  6. James Andreoni
  7. Jean Decety
  8. Paul J. Zak

Citations in the corpus