Measurement Invariance Testing with Many Groups: A Comparison of Five Approaches

By E. S. Kim, Chunhua Cao, Yan Wang, Diep T. Nguyen. 2017

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c63827c115bf256b6368c43764932b94a17cad29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Nawaf Alabduljader
2. Ravi S. Ramani
3. Herman Aguinis
4. Marc Orlitzky
5. Gerd J. Hahn

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ravi S. Ramani
2. Nawaf Alabduljader
3. Herman Aguinis

In Statistics and Probability

1. Nawaf Alabduljader
2. Ravi S. Ramani
3. Herman Aguinis

Citations in the corpus

• Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews (2020, methodology): “As an additional opportunity, Vandenberg and Lance’s article was published over 20 years ago and before recent methodological advancements, such as the use of Bayesian methods to assess measurement invariance (Kim et al., 2017), or more recent reviews of measurement invariance (e.”