Renewable fuels from algae: an answer to debatable land based fuels.

By Anoop Singh, P. Nigam, J. Murphy. Bioresource Technology, 2011

674 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c61853e1e1b790ecc227f9f4da4f97943e488071

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Application of Molecular Sieves in Transformations of Biomass and Biomass-Derived Feedstocks (2013, background): “This considerably exceeds the yields of palm oil and sugar cane (192 and 124 GJ/ha/yr, respectively) (50).”
Biodiesel production from algae cultivated in winter with artificial wastewater through pH regulation by acetic acid (2014, neutral): “due to feedstock limitation [4].”
Morphology, composition, production, processing and applications of Chlorella vulgaris: A review (2014, background): “If production plants were installed in an intelligent way, microalgae would not compete with agricultural lands, there would be no conflict with food production [16] and especially would not cause deforestation.”
Biodiesel from microalgae: A critical evaluation from laboratory to large scale production (2013, background): “Marine microalgal species have been shown to produce higher levels of phospholipids than triacylglycerols (TAGs) [64].”
Fatty acids profiling: A selective criterion for screening microalgae strains for biodiesel production (2013, background): “These FFAs incorporated into the structure of tri-acylglycerols and phospholipids eventually compose the methyl esters of biodiesel in a process known as transesterification [36–38].”
How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated (2012, background): “As a result, third-generation biofuels cultivated from arable biomass may ultimately be the best long-term option (Singh et al., 2011).”
Evaluation and comparison of algal cell disruption methods: Microwave, waterbath, blender, ultrasonic and laser treatment (2013, background): “ber of potential advantages over other feedstocks: they have higher growth rates than conventional crops, they can fix significant quantities of CO2 (almost double their dry weight in some cases), they may produce up to 20 times the oil per unit area than palm oil, and they do not displace land for ”