Removing artefacts from TMS-EEG recordings using independent component analysis: Importance for assessing prefrontal and motor cortex network properties
By Nigel C. Rogasch, Richard H. Thomson, Faranak Farzan, Bernadette M. Fitzgibbon, Neil W. Bailey, Julio C. Hernandez-Pavon, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Paul B. Fitzgerald. NeuroImage, 2014
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5d3ce6731cbd4b579af0a074dcb2783e2513d7b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Neurology
In Psychiatry and Mental health
Citations in the corpus
- Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives (2016, unknown): “Following the interference approach, the coil position and orientation producing themaximally disruptive effects is considered optimal, e.g. when functionally localizing Broca's area by inducing speech arrest (Rogic et al., 2014) or to localize the FEF by saccade delay (Ro et al., 2002).”
- The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies (2018, result): “…the amplitudes of the TEPs were well within the range of previous TMS-EEG studies on healthy conscious individuals, ranging from 2 to 6 μV (Herring et al., 2015; Kahkonen et al., 2005; Kerwin et al., 2018; Komssi et al., 2004; Noda et al., 2016; Premoli et al., 2014a; Rogasch et al., 2014).”
- Cognitive state dependent enhancement of cognitive control with transcranial magnetic stimulation (2026, unknown): “We applied a two-step independent component analysis (ICA) procedure to first remove TMS-evoked pulse and muscle artifacts, and a second ICA to remove remaining artifactual components 60,61 .”