Experimental economics: Where next?

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An evolutionary perspective (2019, unknown): “Since cA and cB are divisible by and cB > ; then xB ; x U A 2 D (VH) : Let b xA = max x 2 D (VH)j (VH x) N 1 N cA VM b xB = min x 2 D (VH)jx 1 N cB VM : (6)”
Attitudes to Income Inequality: Experimental and Survey Evidence (2014, background): “This special issue includes the critique by Binmore and Shaked (2010a), the replies by Fehr and Schmidt (2010) and Eckel and Gintis (2010), and the rejoinder by Binmore and Shaked (2010b).”
Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data. (2015, background): “Although condensing social reward value into a common value variable is tempting and would help to conceptualize decisions, nonvalue factors such as strategy may importantly influence decisions (50, 150, 151).”
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences (2011, background): “(Note that only the range of offers up See also Binmore and Shaked (2010) and Fehr and Schmidt (2010).”
The Complexity Era in Economics (2011, background): “Such areas will require a weeding out, as researchers arrive at consensus about what is and isn’t an acceptable experiment (Binmore & Shaked, 2010; Fehr & Schmidt, 2010).”