Directions in reintroduction biology.

By D. Armstrong, P. Seddon. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008

1,065 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c57fcf7d5e38bcc5e6033a31cb9b9f598ebd56a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

When to end releases in reintroduction programmes: demographic rates and population viability analysis of bearded vultures in the Alps (2009, methodology): “However, we focused on the establishment of a self-growing population ( Armstrong & Seddon 2008 ) as a first step towards viability, without considering density dependence since we had no reliable estimate of the carrying capacity.”
Restoring species through reintroductions: strategies for source population selection (2015, background): “A number of guidelines and best practices for reintroduction programs have emerged, which largely focus on habitat restoration and the demographics and logistics of translocation (Montalvo et al. 1997; Armstrong & Seddon 2008).”
Using the movement patterns of reintroduced animals to improve reintroduction success (2014, background): “Increasing the success rate of reintroduction programs calls for better and more efficient post-release monitoring of the reintroduced animals (Fischer and Lindenmayer, 2000; Nichols and Williams, 2006; Armstrong and Seddon, 2008).”
Psittacine reintroductions: Common denominators of success (2012, background): “terms of population establishment and persistence: survival and reproduction (Seddon, 1999b; Teixiera et al., 2007; Armstrong and Seddon, 2008; Tavecchia et al., 2009).”
Animal Translocations: What are they and why do we do them? (2012, neutral): “…in historic times (IUCN, 1987) Reintroduction biology Research undertaken to improve the outcomes of reintroductions and other translocations (Armstrong & Seddon, 2008) Relocation Synonym for translocation Restocking Synonym for re-enforcement Restoration ecology The science upon which the…”
From Reintroduction to Assisted Colonization: Moving along the Conservation Translocation Spectrum (2010, background): “In parallel with restoration ecology, the emerging discipline of reintroduction biology has been grappling with similar issues (Seddon et al. 2007a), including developing its scientific underpinnings (Seddon et al. 2007b) and seeking unifying research directions (Armstrong & Seddon 2008).”
Reintroduction objectives, decisions and outcomes: global perspectives from the herpetofauna (2014, neutral): “…1998; Griffith et al., 1989) and that post-release monitoring is often lacking and unfocused (Scott & Carpenter, 1987; Dodd & Seigel, 1991; Seddon, 1999; Fischer & Lindenmayer, 2000; Seigel & Dodd, 2000; Ewen & Armstrong, 2007; Armstrong & Seddon, 2008; Scott et al., 2010; Sutherland et al., 2010).”
Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment (2015, background): “…more integrative, standardized and theoretically sound approach to reintroductions and other conservation translocations (e.g. assisted colonizations; IUCN/SSC, 2013) to improve project outcomes and contribute to fundamental ecological research (Sarrazin & Barbault, 1996; Armstrong & Seddon, 2008).”
Predation and other factors currently limiting New Zealand forest birds. (2010, background): “Similarly, species translocations may result in population establishment, but long-term monitoring is required to demonstrate population persistence (Armstrong & Seddon 2007).”
No place like home: an experimental comparison of reintroduction strategies using snakes (2010, background): “This limited success has led to the development of many novel techniques for reintroduction programmes and calls for the application of more scientifically rigorous approaches to addressing problems (Fischer & Lindenmayer 2000; Seddon et al. 2007; Armstrong & Seddon 2008; Kingsbury & Attum 2009).”
Captive-reared burrowing owls show higher site-affinity, survival, and reproductive performance when reintroduced using a soft-release (2011, neutral): “Without such assessments, the reasons that releases succeed or fail remain ambiguous, and animal conservation managers cannot base their decisions on direct evidence (Pullin et al., 2004; Armstrong and Seddon, 2008).”