The new economic geography: Past, present and the future

By Masahisa Fujita, Paul Krugman. 2003

686 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c57f19a37e1250b6ce4381b2cbb56ca34eceb063

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Adding geography to the new economic geography : bridging the gap between theory and empirics (2010, background): “recommendations made by Fujita and Krugman (2004) , p.158; Behrens and Thisse (2007),”
Rethinking institutional distance: strengthening the tie between new institutional theory and international management (2009, background): “In fact, the country level is often not the most appropriate level of analysis because ‘economic activity occurs at many geographical levels, having a variety of compositions’ (Fujita and Krugman, 2004: 3).”
Contemporary Crisis Across Europe and the Crisis of Regional Development Theories (2014, background): “As is by now well-known – and so we simply briefly mention them here this “third way of thinking” is identified with two major schools of thought: first, the so-called New Economic Geography (NEG) or “geographical economics” with key thinkers such as KRUGMAN (1991), FUJITA and Krugman (2004) and VEN”
Economic geography : a contemporary introduction (2007, background): “The political economy perspective is now well known in economic geography, but we should distinguish clearly how our conception of new economic geographies is different from the quantitative modelling version of so-called ‘new economic geography’ in economics (e.g. Krugman, 2000; Fujita and Krugman,”
Frontiers of the New Economic Geography (2005, background): “An alternative, perhaps more realistic approach has been proposed by Fujita and Krugman [55].”
Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries (2009, background): “Trade and industries frequently cluster geographically (Porter, 2000a; Fujita and Krugman, 2004).”
Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications (2019, neutral): “There has been no shortage of attention in urban economic research given to the potentially negative externalities related to growth in agglomerations: congestion, pollution and high land costs have featured prominently (Fujita and Krugman, 2004).”