Threat, coping and flood prevention – A meta-analysis

By S. Bamberg, T. Masson, K. Brewitt, Natascha Nemetschek. 2017

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Ocean Engineering, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c577fb381ba351fd5f84f342781ae5ec22a528dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Kuhlicke
2. L. Steg
3. A. V. van Valkengoed
4. Heidi Kreibich
5. P. Bubeck
6. T. Grothmann
7. Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts

In Ocean Engineering

1. L. Steg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Steg
2. A. V. van Valkengoed
3. A. Heidenreich
4. C. Kuhlicke
5. C. Begg
6. Heidi Kreibich
7. P. Bubeck
8. S. Bamberg

Citations in the corpus

• Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour (2019, background): “At the same time, our results suggest that the protection motivation theory could be expanded to include factors that were also important predictors of adaptation, specifically descriptive norms (see also 8 ) and negative affect.”
• The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications (2020, background): “The first quantitative meta-analysis conducted by Bamberg et al. (2017) in this intellectual catchment found that threat and coping appraisal (together with negative flood-related emotions) on average explain only 13% of the variance in flood-adaptive behaviors/intentions.”