Consuming Values and Contested Cultures: A Critical Analysis of the UK Strategy for Sustainable Consumption and Production

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ecological Citizenship and Sustainable Consumption: Examining Local Organic Food Networks. (2006, unknown): “…the fact that its precise definition is as elusive as that of its predecessor on the environmental agenda, sustainable development; the extent and nature of the transformation required is hotly debated, reflecting as it does competing deep-rooted beliefs about society and nature (Seyfang, 2004).”
A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions (2015, background): “, 2007, 2008), and analyses of policy debates (Seyfang, 2004; Fuchs and Lorek, 2005; Clark, 2007; Berg and Hukkinen, 2011).”
Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability (2008, background): “…alongside consumption choices as a way for individuals and social groups to express their beliefs, norms, political commitments and differences in a pluralist society (Cosgel and Minkler, 2004; Paavola, 2001; Seyfang 2004, 2005; see also Carter and Huby, 2005, on ethical investment consumerism).”
A Review of Sustainable Consumption (2000 to 2020): What We Know and What We Need to Know (2020, unknown): “On the basis of our review, it is apparent that a frequently used theory is the theory of planned behavior (Chekima et al., 2016; Geng et al., 2017; Rezvani et al., 2018; Yarimoglu & Binboga, 2019), followed by cultural theory (Dolan, 2002; Seyfang, 2004).”