Rank-related partner choice in the fission–fusion society of the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta)

By Jennifer E. Smith, Sandra K. Memenis, Kay E. Holekamp. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2007

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5631dc9bf4656efd9cd9eae17136cd009804da3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Reciprocal Altruism in Primates: Partner Choice, Cognition, and Emotions (2009, background): “, 1997) preferentially joined subgroups containing higher‐ranking animals in exchange for increased tolerance (Smith et al., 2007).”
Numerical assessment and individual call discrimination by wild spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta (2011, unknown): “…hyaenas demonstrate complex social cognitive abilities that appear to require individual recognition, including recognition of third-party relationships among group members (Engh et al. 2005), and individual assessment of potential social partners based on their relative value (Smith et al. 2007).”
Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spotted hyaenas (2011, background): “Furthermore, whereas adult females maintain long-term social bonds (Holekamp et al. 1997a), associations among adult males are often weak (Smith et al. 2007) or short-lived (Van Horn et al. 2003).”
Home range overlap, matrilineal and biparental kinship drive female associations in bottlenose dolphins (2010, background): “…patterns (e.g. zebra, Equus grevyi, and onager, Equus hemionus: Sundaresan et al. 2007; spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta: Smith et al. 2007), but few studies have investigated the effect of spatial overlap on association patterns (De Villiers & Kok 1997; Carter et al.…”
Fission‐Fusion Dynamics (2008, background): “Therefore, we suggest that future research must focus on the communication and cognitive demands regarding not only fusion decisions (e.g., Aureli and Schaffner 2007; Smith, Memenis, and Holekamp 2007) but also fission decisions.”
Sociality of the dispersing sex: The nature of social bonds in West African female chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes (2009, unknown): “…cooperation (Blundell et al. 2004) and coalitionary support (e.g. Mitani et al. 2000), increased tolerance from more dominant group members (e.g. Smith et al. 2007) and, among females, social bonds may also provide a benign environment for successfully raising and socializing offspring…”
Social and ecological determinants of fission-fusion dynamics in the spotted hyaena (2008, methodology): “Individuals choose to join subgroups containing particular clan members, and they vary in the extent to which they associate with conspecifics (Szykman et al. 2001; Smith et al. 2007).”
Grooming for tolerance? Two mechanisms of exchange in wild tufted capuchin monkeys (2011, background): “Limited correlational evidence of this kind of partner choice is also available for some nonprimate species (Smith et al. 2007; Romero and Aureli 2008).”
Fission–fusion dynamics in wild giraffes may be driven by kinship, spatial overlap and individual social preferences (2013, background): “…relationships are of particular interest in populations with fissione fusion dynamics, in which individuals temporarily associate so that group membership and group size change frequently (e.g. Brager 1999; Cross et al. 2005; Bashaw et al. 2007; Smith et al. 2007; reviewed by Aureli et al. 2008).”
Chapter 2 Reciprocal Altruism in Primates (2009, background): “, 1997) preferentially joined subgroups containing higher‐ranking animals in exchange for increased tolerance (Smith et al., 2007).”