Reciprocal Altruism in Primates: Partner Choice, Cognition, and Emotions

By G. Schino, Filippo Aureli. 2009

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f91820f51f8709c62b4192d3236149c8a8c5572

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The evolution of food sharing in primates (2011, background): “This study thus lends further support to the growing body of evidence for the reciprocal exchange of low-cost altruistic acts among primates (Silk 2002; Schino 2007; Schino and Aureli 2009).”
Production of food-associated calls in wild male chimpanzees is dependent on the composition of the audience (2010, unknown): “Although the evidence for reciprocal interchange of different services in chimpanzees is mixed (Gomes and Boesch 2009; Gilby 2006; Mitani and Watts 2001; Schino and Aureli 2009), it is possible that food call production may be a ‘currency’ that is exchanged amongst individuals for other services.”
Reciprocity and conditional cooperation between great tit parents (2014, unknown): “Although reciprocity is common in humans, evidence for it in animals is sparse and in some cases contentious (Wilkinson 1984; Stevens and Hauser 2004; Stevens et al. 2005; West et al. 2007; Krams et al. 2008; Clutton-Brock 2009; Schino and Aureli 2009; Cheney et al. 2010).”
Mechanisms of reciprocity in primates: testing for short-term contingency of grooming and food sharing in bonobos and chimpanzees (2013, background): “…of food, grooming 421 and support among the same chimpanzees (Jaeggi et al., 2010a) is consistent with the partner 422 choice model in which the likelihood of providing a service depends on the history of past 423 interactions, outweighing single recent events (Schino & Aureli, 2009; 2010).”
The development of contingent reciprocity in children (2013, background): “Interestingly, studies with non-human primates also suggest that reciprocity might be stronger across longer timescales (Schino & Aureli, 2009; Jaeggi, de Groot, Stevens, & van Schaik, in press in EHB).”
Grooming for tolerance? Two mechanisms of exchange in wild tufted capuchin monkeys (2011, background): “Under these conditions, the only possible approach to analyzing reciprocity is to explore the temporal relations between giving and receiving (Silk 2007; Schino and Aureli 2009).”