The intellectual capital performance of the Japanese banking sector

By D. Mavridis. 2004

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5527f2fba082391e1396576b9d944e393e79340

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

1. Jian Xu
2. A. Alhassan
3. N. Asare
4. Neha Smriti
5. N. Das
6. Mahesh Chandra Joshi
7. D. Cahill
8. J. Sidhu

Citations in the corpus

• The Evolving research on intellectual capital (2008, methodology): “Mavridis (2004) uses the Pulic VAIC method to analyze the data of Japanese banks.”
• Determinants of financial performance of Islamic banks: An intellectual capital perspective (2017, result): “Overall, our findings in the context of IFIs are consistent with previous research in the context of conventional banks by prior studies (Mavridis, 2004; Goh, 2005; Murthy and Mouritsen, 2011), that posit that the best performing banks are those that utilized their human intellectual capital and…”
• Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia (2005, background): “He also noted significant differences in intellectual capital performance among different groups of Japanese banks ( Mavridis, 2004”
• The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI (2018, methodology): “VAIC has been used in a number of studies as an indicator for VA by IC coefficient (Mavridis, 2004; Kamath, 2008; Joshi et al., 2013; Purohit and Tondon, 2015).”
• Intellectual capital and bank productivity in emerging markets: evidence from Ghana (2016, background): “This study follows empirical literature (see Mavridis, 2004; Goh, 2005; Ting and Lean, 2009; Mondal and Ghosh, 2012; Chen et al., 2014) and adopts the value added intellectual capital of Pulic (1998, 2001) to measure intellectual capital performance in the banking industry of Ghana.”
• Intellectual capital performance of quoted banks on the Istanbul stock exchange market (2007, result): “The literature review also supports this assumption (Mavridis, 2004; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005).”
• Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Performance: a Systematic Review of the Literature (2012, methodology): “VAICTM has been used in a number of studies investigating the link between IC and performance (e.g. Calisir et al., 2010; Diez et al., 2010; Kujansivu and Lönnqvist, 2007; Mavridis 2004; Yalama & Coskun, 2007).”
• Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia (2011, methodology): “IC information from questionnaires of CEOs No relationship between Soft IC and Performance Performance = Profit and Sales per Employee Financial Data Only Mavridis (2004) 141 Japanese banks between 2000 and 2001 + relationship between VA, and Physical Capital and HC HC is important for a bank’s perf”
• Intellectual Capital Efficiency and Firm’s Performance: Study on Malaysian Financial Sectors (2009, background): “Hence, highly skilled individuals are needed to facilitate the delivery of high value-added products and services as well as the competencies to build consumers’ confidence and trust (Mavridis, 2004).”
• The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Investors' Capital Gains on Shares: An Empirical Investigation of Thai Banking, Finance & Insurance Sector (2007, background): “Ante Pulic (1998) developed VAIC to help managers enhance their firms’ performance.”