Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives

By Adrian Brügger. Global Environmental Change, 2020

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many perceive climate change to be more relevant to distant places, future times, and other people than to the here and now and oneself. This perception has sparked interest in construal level theory (CLT) as a framework to understand how the public sees climate change, and how the subjective psychological distance at which people mentally represent objects affects their decisions and actions. Although at first CLT may appear to be the ideal lens through which to investigate psychological distance, I argue that applications of the theory in explaining and predicting climate change (in)action are limited. Researchers have sometimes used CLT in ways inconsistent with its original articulation; namely, (1) when claiming that psychological distant events are less personally relevant than close events; (2) when treating psychological distance as a stable individual belief; and (3) when speculating about what happens when such beliefs change. This article identifies places where research diverges from the scope of CLT, and suggests alternative perspectives that are theoretically better suited to investigating some important and common questions. As a constructive plea for theoretically rigorous research projects and practical work, this article outlines directions for future research that should help advance the field's understanding of psychological distance in the context of climate change and make interventions more effective.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c502175e0cea470cf1419f14105f26b7e359575b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct (2021, background): “First, cross-sectional quantitative studies in particular used PD as a stable construct, relating it to other stable characteristics such as values or ecological worldviews (e.g., Chen, 2020), giving support to observations by Brügger (2020).”
Influencing Climate Change Attitudes in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020, background): “Newell, 2015), perhaps because reduced distance may increase fear (Spence & Pidgeon, 2010) or because CLT may not be a good theoretical fit for climate change (Brügger, 2020).”