Investment and Market Dominance
By Susan Athey, A. Schmutzler. 2001
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4d320b67d33aa58437f8b0c6ed8db3c3bb2c54a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Leandro Arozamena
- Xavier Vives
- Estelle Cantillon
- Jan Boone
- J. Bikker
- Michiel van Leuvensteijn
- A. Mirzaei
- T. Moore
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Learning-By-Doing, Organizational Forgetting, and Industry Dynamics (2007, unknown): “Athey & Schmutzler (2001) extend this idea to dynamic games with deterministic state-to-state transitions.”
- Supermodularity and Complementarity in Economics: An Elementary Survey (2005, unknown): “These include Bagwell and Ramey (1994), Friedman and Johnson (1997), Peitz (2000), and Athey and Schmutzler (2001).”
- Pass-through as an Economic Tool (2009, unknown): “…is a reasonable measure of equilibrium strategic substitutability or complementarity (Fudenberg and Tirole, 1984; Bulow et al., 1985) in duopoly and extends to oligopoly naturally only under symmetry (Athey and Schmutzler, 2001), which is why we maintain that assumption (see our conclusion).”
- Complementarities and Games: New Developments (2005, background): “The second application is to examine the conditions under which increasing or decreasing dominance occurs in oligopoly (Athey and Schmutzler (2001)).”
- Investment incentives in procurement auctions (2001, background): “Recently, Athey and Schmutzler (2001) have derived sufficient conditions for leaders in oligopoly markets to invest more than followers (an outcome they term " weak increasing dominance " ).”
- Is there a U-shaped relation between competition and investment? (2011, unknown): “This follows from Theorem 1 in Athey and Schmutzler (2001), which gives general conditions for games with strategic substitutes guaranteeing that one firm invests more than another one.”
- A New Way to Measure Competition (2004, background): “This assumption can also be called a level playing field assumption or an exchangeability assumption (Athey and Schmutzler, 2001).”