Overseas innovations by Japanese firms: an analysis of patent and subsidiary data

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence (2007, background): “affiliates. Antras (2005) asserted the importance of incorporating organizational economics into”
Organizational Learning in Multinationals: R&D Networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK* (2003, background): “Therefore, their R&D activities have remained highly centralized in the home laboratories and the level of R&D intensity of their foreign subsidiaries is low compared with that of the US or European multinationals (Belderdos, 2001; Meyer-Krahmer and Reger, 1999).”
An econometric analysis of asymmetric volatility : Theory and application to patents (2007, background): “…de la Potterie, 2001); the effectiveness of patents versus secrets in innovation (Arundel, 2001); overseas innovations by Japanese firms (Belderbos, 2001); the Canadian biotechnology industry (Hall and Bagchi-Sen, 2002); and the analysis of Canon’s printers and Sanyo’s photovaltaics…”
Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States (2006, unknown): “12 Belderbos (2001) shows that throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the innovative activity of Japanese firms' U.S. subsidiaries was very small compared to the R&D activity of the parent firm, and these subsidiaries accounted for only a small fraction of the parent system's total U.S. patents (on the…”