Spatial Partitioning of Predation Risk in a Multiple Predator–Multiple Prey System

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of the population dynamics of mule deer and black‐tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus in North America (2013, background): “However, an observational study in Montana, USA, during wolf recolonization showed that higher wolf populations actually resulted in lower predation risk for mule deer (Atwood et al. 2007, 2009), and the overall impact of wolves on mule deer remains unresolved.”
Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions (2012, background): “Hence, by shifting to a densely forested area, prey may decrease their vulnerability to a cursorial predator while simultaneously increasing it to a stalker (e.g. Atwood et al. 2009).”
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia (2012, background): “1980; Sinclair and Pech 1996), and trophic interaction intensity varies with complexity (Atwood et al. 2009).”