Who wants to redistribute?: The tunnel effect in 1990s Russia

By M. Ravallion, Michael Lokshin. 2000

389 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c46a398ce0af7f72907936d4bc933275d0642499

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Inequality and Happiness: Are Americans and Europeans Different? (2004, neutral): “The first reason is based on the fact that psychologists, who study well being for a living, widely use these data.”
ETHNIC DIVERSITY, PUBLIC SPENDING, AND INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT FOR THE WELFARE STATE: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE (2013, neutral): “See for instance Piketty (1995), Ravallion and Lokshin (2000), Bénabou and Ok (2001), Corneo (2001), Corneo and Grüner (2000, 2002), Senik (2004, 2006, 2008), Alesina and La Ferrara (2005b), and the surveys by Borck (2007) and by Alesina and Giuliano (2009).”
Limits to redistribution in a democracy: a survey (2003, background): “21 However, even if the cross- 20 Empirical support for Hirschman's 'tunnel effect' is found by Ravallion and Lokshin (2000) who explore the attitude towards government redistribution in Russia in the 1990s.”
Good bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of Communism on people's preferences (2006, positive): “Ravallion and Lokshin (2000) consider Russian data.”
Inequality-Aversion and Income Mobility: A Direct Test (2003, methodology): “Using experimental methods, Rutström and Williams (2000) find no independent role for income inequality in explaining individual choices.”
Is the Welfare State Sustainable? Experimental Evidence on Citizens' Preferences for Redistribution (2010, positive): “The simplest framework for the analysis of purely economic determinants is provided by a model focusing on current economic well-being, originally proposed by Romer (1975) and Roberts (1977) and extended by Meltzer and Richard (1981) [RRMR model].”
Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution (2002, result): “Similar findings about the effects from being female and being old are reported by Ravallion and Lokshin (2000).”
Attitudes to Income Inequality: Experimental and Survey Evidence (2014, background): “Along these lines, Ravallion and Lokshin (2000), using Russian microdata, were the first to show that self-assessed expected own social mobility, or the belief of being on a rising income trajectory, leads to lower demand for redistribution.”
Poor, or Just Feeling Poor? On Using Subjective Data in Measuring Poverty (2012, background): “31 For more recent discussions and evidence see Ravallion and Lokshin (2000) and Senik (2004).”
Knowing what is good for you (2006, positive): “For the richest income quintile, the probability of being very satisfied is 17% higher than for the bottom quintile, ceteris paribus.”
Preferences For Redistribution and Perception of Fairness: An Experimental Study (2014, positive): “are perceived as fair or not (Piketty 1995; Ravallion and Lokshin, 2000; Graham and Pettinato, 2002; Alesina, et al. 2004; Alesina and Angeletos, 2005; Benabou and Tirole, 2006).”
Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries (2011, background): “Ravallion and Lokshin [34] and Corneo and Grüner [15, 16]”