Should we measure corporate social responsibility
By Jouni Korhonen. 2003
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c45b268a827667592c5f25a5ed1ea2e6ad587cd5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Corporate Social Performance as a Bottom Line for Consumers (2005, background): “…the field of CSP (Entine, 2003; Graves & Waddock, 1994; Griffin & Mahon, 1997; Rowley & Berman, 2000; Waddock & Graves, 1997a, 1997b; Wood & Jones, 1995)—and concepts such as company environmental management, eco-efficiency, and ecoefficacy have been introduced in the field of CSR (Korhonen, 2003).”
- Rethinking standards from green to sustainable (2004, background): “However, it is questionable whether the current level of government contribution can be sustained if applications increase significantly, while the scoring of yes/no responses is open to interpretation and assumes tradeability in performance between different indicators (Korhonen 2003).”
- Communicating sustainability: A web content analysis of North American, Asian and European firms (2008, background): “…a geographical perspective regarding sustainability reporting Page 2 Sustainability is recognised as the basis for corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Korhonen, 2003) which refers broadly “to the level of contribution a company makes towards the betterment of society” (Uhlaner et al 2004:186).”