Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Eects under Exogeneity: A Review
By Guido W. Imbens. 2003
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c45800a723597d5ee7239c221c170f07fe60ca32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Susan Athey
- Cynthia Rudin
- Stefan Wager
- Guido W. Imbens
- M. Lechner
- Marco Caliendo
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Alberto Abadie
Citations in the corpus
- Farmer Bargaining Power and Market Information Services (2015, unknown): “It is important that the covariates X are not a ected by the treatment (Imbens, 2004), which is why we use values from 2008-2009, assuming that they will not yet be a ected by the program on the exact date that it starts.”
- Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia (2007, background): “For more on the balancing hypotheses and testing for higher moments I refer to Imbens (2003).”
- Protecting Ecosystems and Alleviating Poverty with Parks and Reserves: ‘Win-Win’ or Tradeoffs? (2011, methodology): “To improve precision, we form the socioeconomic counterfactual group by combining propensity score and trimming methods (Imbens 2004; Imbens and Wooldridge 2009).”
- Can Propensity-Score Methods Match the Findings from a Random Assignment Evaluation of Mandatory Welfare-to-Work Programs? (2004, methodology): “Although a number of studies using propensity-score matching have adjusted standard errors using bootstrapping, Imbens (2003) questions whether this is appropriate in view of the discontinuities introduced by matching.”
- Sequential Matching Estimation of Dynamic Causal Models (2004, unknown): “15 For more details see the excellent survey by Imbens (2003).”
- Automated versus Do-It-Yourself Methods for Causal Inference: Lessons Learned from a Data Analysis Competition (2017, background): “To obtain the ATT (or ATC), this averaging is performed over the distribution of X for the treatment (or control) group.”
- Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects (2009, unknown): “Dehejia and Wahba (1999), who also focus on estimating the ATT, discard those non-treated group observations 1See Rosenbaum (2001), Heckman, LaLonde and Smith (1999), Wooldridge (2002), Blundell and Costa-Diaz (2002), Imbens (2004) and Lee (2005a) for surveys of this literature.”
- The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: The Role of Fees and Management Companies (2010, methodology): “…sA sBð Þ2 r2s þ aA aBð Þ 2 r2a þ cA cBð Þ 2 r2c s ; where r2k is the sample variance of variable k. 9 For a more detailed discussion of the matching estimators analysis and a comparison to other methods, see Imbens (2004).”
- How Satisfied are the Self-Employed? A Life Domain View (2015, unknown): “Unless there is substantial overlap in the two sets of covariate distributions, multivariate regression estimates rely heavily on extrapolation, and can be misleading (Imbens 2004; Ichino et al. 2008, pp. 312–313).”
- Nonparametric Tests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity (2008, unknown): “See also the discussion in Imbens (2004).”
- MALTS: Matching After Learning to Stretch (2018, background): “Zhao (2004) and Imbens (2004) discuss the choice of distance metric for matching.”
- Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching (2019, methodology): “To clarify this notation, we require two assumptions (Imbens 2004).”
- Evaluating online ad campaigns in a pipeline: causal models at scale (2010, background): “(See [12], [11] and the references therein, for example.)”
- Moving the Goalposts: Addressing Limited Overlap in Estimation of Average Treatment Effects by Changing the Estimand (2006, unknown): “3See, for example, Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983b), Rosenbaum (2001), Imbens (2003), and Ichino, Mealli, and Nannicini (2005).”
- Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata (2004, background): “In addition, Imbens (2003) argues that most studies will want to proceed under the Assumption 2.1 at some during the analysis.”