The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: The Role of Fees and Management Companies

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds (2011, background): “Diltz (1995) examined various dimensions of SRI for the US Osthoff (2007), Galema et al. (2008), Gil-Bazo et al. (2010) or Derwall and Koedijk (2009).”
The Efficiency of Performance-based-fee Funds (2011, unknown): “Contrary to these theoretical implications, Gil-Bazo and Ruiz-Verdú (2009) has recently found a robust negative relation between raw risk-adjusted performance and expenses in a comprehensive sample of U.S. equity mutual funds.”
Is it risky to go green? A volatility analysis of the green bond market (2016, background): “On the other hand, Gil-bazo, Ruiz-verdu, and Santos (2010) find that company management plays an important role in the performance of socially responsible mutual funds.”
A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Socially Responsible Funds (2019, background): “More specifically, many of them focused on whether the performance of SRI funds was worse than that of conventional funds [35,43,72,73], whereas others analyzed the effect of size, cash flows [55] or fund fees [43,57].”