Examining the Ways Institutions Create Student Engagement: The Role of Mission

By Adrianna J Kezar, J. Kinzie. 2006

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4459a9c8d4ac2faecd71d092fd80360c84b8168

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Malcolm Tight
2. John C. Hayek
3. Jillian Kinzie
4. George D. Kuh
5. B. Bridges
6. Jennifer Buckley
7. Stephen R. Porter
8. Reynol Junco

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Malcolm Tight

In Political Science and International Relations

1. George D. Kuh
2. Malcolm Tight
3. Stephen R. Porter

Citations in the corpus

• What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature (2006, background): “For example, the extent to which a campus has an enacted mission that makes an explicit commitment to the success of all students appears to be related to graduation rates, persistence, and student engagement (Kezar and Kinzie 2006; Kuh et al. 2005b).”
• Student retention and engagement in higher education (2020, background): “Others have focused on variations in the institutional approach taken to engagement in terms of institutional missions (e.g. Kezar and Kinzie 2006; Pike and Kuh 2005), and on variation in student engagement by year of study (e.g. Soria and Stebleton 2012) or discipline (e.g. Leach 2016; Pike,…”