EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview
By M. Timmer, M. O’Mahony, B. Ark. 2007
282 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c41bb8762f18a61696eb3b5e2a90c819bcfdd8c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- FDI and productivity convergence in Central and Eastern Europe: an industry-level investigation (2010, unknown): “…of research institutes and financed by the European Commission in order to facilitate productivity analyses in the EU at the industry level (Timmer et al. 2007).12 The main adjustments to the official statistical sources made in the database relate to filling gaps in industry-level data…”
- How Important are Sectoral Shocks (2014, methodology): “A-9 tained by the European Union KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts (EUKLEMS).45 The EUKLEMS data are reviewed, in detail, in Timmer et al. (2007) and O’Mahony and Timmer (2009).”
- A Cross-country Database For Sectoral Employment And Productivity in Asia and Latin America, 1950-2005 (2007, methodology): “And it is a complement to a sectoral database for OECD countries that is available through the EU KLEMS project (www.euklems.net, see Timmer et al. 2007) and a previous study by van Ark (1996).3 Data and detailed documentation of sources and methods of the GGDC 10-sector database are publicly…”
- Market Services Productivity Across Europe and the US (2007, methodology): “Source: Calculations by authors on EU KLEMS database, March 2007 (http://www.euklems.net), described in Timmer et al. (2007).”
- Measuring intangible capital and its contribution to economic growth in Europe. (2009, background): “Real estate activities are also excluded due to the problems in measuring their productivity (EU KLEMS 2008).”
- Industry-level Total-factor Energy Efficiency in Developed Countries (2011, unknown): “Monetary values are measured in euros, with 1997 as the base year, using purchasing power parity, also taken from [26].”