Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models.

By Jay D. Humphrey, Charles A. Taylor. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2008

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c404636c0cf825e65da2eac8faf2fd69d0e9a1e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Neurology

1. Michael W. Gee
2. Wolfgang A. Wall
3. Ulrich Küttler

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

1. Michael W. Gee
2. Wolfgang A. Wall
3. Ulrich Küttler
4. Charles A. Taylor
5. C. Alberto Figueroa

Citations in the corpus

• High WSS or Low WSS? Complex Interactions of Hemodynamics with Intracranial Aneurysm Initiation, Growth, and Rupture: Toward a Unifying Hypothesis (2014, background): “This degradative process may deplete the sac of resident cells and elastin fibers and reduce collagen fibers, forcing the remaining ECM to stretch, creating a stiff thin wall.(19,54) On the other hand, the large, thick-walled, atherosclerotic type II aneurysms appear to have developed during a longe”
• Patient-specific Modeling of Cardiovascular Mechanics (2009, background): “The recent review by Humphrey & Taylor (95) thoroughly discusses the role of computational mechanics in intracranial saccular and abdominal aortic aneurysm research.”
• Truly monolithic algebraic multigrid for fluid–structure interaction (2011, methodology): “This example is an FSI simulation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, an abnormal dilation of the abdominal aorta right above the branch into the two iliac arteries [57].”