Public Policy, Entrepreneurship, And Economic Freedom

By Steven F. Kreft, R. Sobel. 2005

351 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3ac1211cd79cdfd15f53108de4d68c02bfc2f70

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship (2008, background): “First published in his 1990 article, this theory has been further elaborated in Baumol (1990, 1993, 2002), Boettke (2001), Boettke and Coyne (2003), Coyne and Leeson (2004), Kreft and Sobel (2005), and Ovaska and Sobel (2005).”
Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: What Do We Know and What Do We Still Need to Know? (2016, unknown): “2016 297Bjørnskov and Foss economic policy influence the country- or state-level incidence of entrepreneurship are Kreft and Sobel (2005) for the United States, Ovaska and Sobel (2005) for transition countries, Bjørnskov andFoss (2008) for a larger (though still small) cross-country context (27…”
Institutional Entrepreneurship (2006, background): “In the real world, entrepreneurs make this trade-off all the time, as powerfully shown in studies of countries with only partially developed legal frameworks, such as Peru (de Soto, 2000) and in cross-country comparisons (Olson, 1996; Kreft and Sobel, 2005).”
Capital is not enough: opportunity entrepreneurship and formal institutions (2018, unknown): “2013; Powell and Weber 2013), total early-stage entrepreneurship (Bjørnskov and Foss 2008, 2013, 2016; Boudreaux 2014; Gohmann et al. 2008; Kreft and Sobel 2005; McMullen et al. 2008; Sobel 2008; Sobel et al. 2007; Sobel and Hall 2008), and innovation (Boudreaux 2017; Simón-Moya et al.”
Freedom, barriers to entry, entrepreneurship, and economic progress (2007, unknown): “Economic development policies over the last two decades have noticeably shifted away from trying to attract large manufacturing firms, and toward encouraging internal entrepreneurship (Kreft and Sobel 2005).”
Panel evidence on economic freedom and growth in the United States (2011, methodology): “State-level economic freedom has been used in the analysis of other areas, such as, the work of Kreft and Sobel (2005) and Ashby (2007) who have”
The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data (2008, background): “As noted by Blanchflower (2000), work linking institutional factors to self-employment is relatively scarce in 1An additional empirical study worth mentioning is the study by Kreft and Sobel (2005), which focuses on the institutional differences in economic freedom across US states.”
The Context of Entrepreneurial Judgment: Organizations, Markets, and Institutions (2019, background): “[3] The foundational studies are here Kreft and Sobel (2005), Ovaska and Sobel (2005) Bjørnskov and Foss (2008), and Nyström (2008).”
Income inequality and economic freedom in the U.S. states (2008, background): “…and migration, for example, have for the most part carried over to cross-state analysis with equally significant results (Karabegovic et al. 2003; Kreft and Sobel 2005; Ashby 2007).3 In this paper we conduct the first analysis of how differences in economic freedom among U.S. states impacts…”
Cross‐Country Determinants of Early‐Stage Necessity and Opportunity‐Motivated Entrepreneurship: Accounting for Model Uncertainty (2018, unknown): “…Keilbach, and Lehmann 2006; Baumol and Strom 2007), cultural values (Tiessen 1997; Welter 2012), formal institutions (Bjørnskov and Foss 2010; Kreft and Sobel 2005; McMullen, Bagby, and Palich 2008; Nystr€om 2008), and even post-materialistic values (Uhlaner and Thurik 2010) and role…”
Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence (2008, methodology): “In the use of this type of data in this context, we follow Kreft and Sobel (2005).”