The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data
By K. Nyström. 2008
431 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c28bd21204cfe55575fe89cccc2535e529e1b3e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- David B. Audretsch
- N. J. Foss
- Maksim Belitski
- Peter G. Klein
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Christian Bjørnskov
- Farzana Chowdhury
In Information Systems
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- David B. Audretsch
- Boris N. Nikolaev
- C. Boudreaux
- Peter G. Klein
- N. J. Foss
- Christian Bjørnskov
In Sociology and Political Science
- Peter G. Klein
- N. J. Foss
- David B. Audretsch
- Boris N. Nikolaev
- C. Boudreaux
- Christian Bjørnskov
- Maksim Belitski
- Farzana Chowdhury
Citations in the corpus
- The Context of Entrepreneurial Judgment: Organizations, Markets, and Institutions (2019, neutral): “[3] The foundational studies are here Kreft and Sobel (2005), Ovaska and Sobel (2005) Bjørnskov and Foss (2008), and Nyström (2008).”
- Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: What Do We Know and What Do We Still Need to Know? (2016, positive): “Thus,Nyström (2008) reexamined the cross-country evidence in Bjørnskov andFoss (2008) in amuch larger sample of countries, using panel data and consistently comparable self-employment rates instead of survey data from the Global EntrepreneurshipMonitor database.”
- The Impact of Educational Levels on Formal and Informal Entrepreneurship (2015, background): “Formal entrepreneurship refers to the creation of egally registered new firms in a country (Klapper et al., 007), whereas informal entrepreneurship focuses on those rms that are not legally registered and are largely unreguated (Nystrom, 2008).”
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Nyström, K. (2008) The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data Institutional approach Panel data Smaller government sector, better legal structure and security of property rights, as well as less regulation of credit, labor and business tend to increase entrep”
- Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship (2014, background): “For example, several studies (e.g., Havrylyshyn, 2001; Kaufmann et al., 2006; Nyström, 2008) show that good institutions and a high level of economic development and technology advancement are positively related to national rates of entrepreneurship.”
- Dependent self-employment as a way to evade employment protection legislation (2011, background): “For international aspects see OECD (2000) and ILO (2003).”
- Cross‐Country Determinants of Early‐Stage Necessity and Opportunity‐Motivated Entrepreneurship: Accounting for Model Uncertainty (2018, positive): “…Lehmann 2006; Baumol and Strom 2007), cultural values (Tiessen 1997; Welter 2012), formal institutions (Bjørnskov and Foss 2010; Kreft and Sobel 2005; McMullen, Bagby, and Palich 2008; Nystr€om 2008), and even post-materialistic values (Uhlaner and Thurik 2010) and role models (Bosma et al. 2012).”
- Socio-cognitive traits and entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic institutions (2019, methodology): “First, prior studies show that institutions affect entrepreneurial action (Bjørnskov & Foss, 2008; Nyström, 2008; McMullen et al., 2008; Nikolaev et al., 2018), but the specific mechanisms through which individual beliefs, expectations, and goals interact with macro-level policies and conditions are”
- Entrepreneurship in a Regional Context: Historical Roots, Recent Developments and Future Challenges (2014, background): “The role played by formal institutions such as entry regulations or labour laws for the emergence and the development of new businesses is extensively documented (BAUMOL, 1990; BOETTKE and COYNE, 2009; HENREKSON, 2007; NYSTROM, 2008; VAN STEL et al., 2007).”
- Regulating away competition: the effect of regulation on entrepreneurship and employment (2017, positive): “The classic public interest model of regulation following Pigou (1938) holds that regulation can counteract market failures and is instituted by government officials to maximize the general welfare. But regulation, although often intended to address some perceived market failure, comes with costs. T”
- Capital is not enough: opportunity entrepreneurship and formal institutions (2018, positive): “The literature overwhelmingly shows that these mechanisms are more effective in societies with more economic freedom (Bjørnskov and Foss 2008; Boudreaux 2014; Bradley and Klein 2016; Herrera-Echeverri et al. 2014; McMullen et al. 2008; Nyström 2008; Powell and Weber 2013; Simón-Moya et al. 2014).”