A taxonomy of web search
By Andrei Z. Broder. SIGF, 2002
2,095 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3ab9b6d22989c4004ff4a714c3f31545c7a13ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Hamed Zamani
- W. Bruce Croft
- Jianfeng Gao
- Nick Craswell
- Jamie Callan
- Bhaskar Mitra
- Kyunghyun Cho
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Emre Kıcıman
- Thorsten Joachims
- Giovanni Romano
- Claudio Carpineto
- Fabrizio Silvestri
- Paolo Ferragina
- Matthew Richardson
- Parag Singla
In Information Systems
- Hamed Zamani
- W. Bruce Croft
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Thorsten Joachims
- Nick Craswell
- Fabrizio Silvestri
- Hang Li
- Filip Radlinski
Citations in the corpus
- Mining long-term search history to improve search accuracy (2006, background): “Usually, the purposes of recurring queries are navigational rather than informational or transactional [2].”
- Understanding user goals in web search (2004, methodology): “From E-Sex to E-Commerce: Web Search Changes.”
- Introduction to the special topic section on mining Web resources for enhancing information retrieval (2007, methodology): “TABLE 1. Query types and their corresponding search tasks/target pages (based on Broder, 2002 ), in addition with search tasks and target page types (according to Craswell & Hawking, 2004).”
- Query Expansion Techniques for Information Retrieval: a Survey (2017, neutral): “Most web queries fall under the three fundamental categories [49,137] :”
- Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities (2007, background): “According to Broder [5], the three main categories of search queries are navigational, informational and transactional.”
- Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation (2008, background): “This intent may correspond to any of the standard Web query types [7]: navigational (seeking a home page), informational (seeking information on power supplies), or transactional (seeking a form to track a package).”
- A large-scale evaluation and analysis of personalized search strategies (2007, background): “Contrarily, for the query “Google”, which is a typical navigational query as defined in [3, 17], almost all of the users are consistently selecting results to redirect to Google’s homepage, and therefore none of the personalized strategies could provide significant benefits to users.”
- What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search (2007, background): “Two or three broad classes of Web search tasks have been identified in the literature [1, 22] and used in various studies on Web search [12, 15, 17].”
- Named entity recognition in query (2009, background): “Query classification falls into two groups: (1) classification according to search intent, such as informational, navigational or transactional [7, 21, 16]; (2) classification according to semantics of query, such as “Shopping” or “Living” [24, 1].”
- A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking (2009, background): “A query is said to be navigational when the user intent is to reach a particular site [3].”
- Web site design with the patron in mind: A step-by-step guide for libraries (2006, neutral): “informational, or transactional [1] .”
- A survey of Web clustering engines (2009, background): “However, they can fail in addressing informational queries (in which the user has an information need to satisfy), which account for the majority of Web searches (see Broder [2002] and Rose and Levinson [2004] for a taxonomy of Web queries).”
- Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback (2005, background): “Thirty six undergraduate student volunteers were instructed to search for the answers to five navigational and five informational queries [5].”
- A personalized search engine based on Web‐snippet hierarchical clustering (2005, methodology): “This feature turns out to be particularly effective when the users submit informative [5], polysemous, or poor queries.”
- Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems (2010, background): “Broder pointed out that many web queries were different from the classic information seeking view of search [34].”
- Tailoring click models to user goals (2009, background): “On the other hand, the authors were aware of two general categories of query terms in existing literatures [2, 15].”
- The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search (2004, background): “Even when researchers supplement query log analysis with user surveys [6], these studies are still limited to searches that involve search engines, omitting many search activities (61% of the search activities in the study presented here did not involve keyword search).”