Multilevel structure in behaviour and in the brain: a model of Fuster's hierarchy
By Matthew Botvinick. 2007
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Matthew Botvinick
- J. Cohen
- Yael Niv
- Andrew Barto
- Michael J Frank
- K. Tye
- Peter S. Dayan
- Nathaniel D. Daw
Citations in the corpus
- A modeling framework for adaptive lifelong learning with transfer and savings through gating in the prefrontal cortex (2020, background): “Together with Koechlin and Summerfield’s (69) cascade model, Botvinick’s (71) model of Fuster’s hierarchy suggests that added layers to a hierarchical structure lead to organizing principles that map to higher levels of abstraction and context.”
- A Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain (2008, unknown): “[63], Botvinick proposed a hierarchical model of behavioural”
- The Computational and Neural Basis of Cognitive Control: Charted Territory and New Frontiers (2014, background): “…making process (e.g., Simen, Cohen, & Holmes, 2006), or the optimal trade-off between different forms of control (e.g., anticipatory vs. reactive; see Braver, Gray, & Burgess, 2007; Botvinick, 2007a; Jimura, Locke, & Braver, 2010; Kool, McGuire, Rosen, & Botvinick, 2010; McGuire & Botvinick, 2010).”
- Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations: A reinforcement-learning perspective (2008, background): “Behavioral hierarchy has also been of longstanding interest within neuroscience, where it has been considered to relate closely to prefrontal cortical function (Badre, 2008; Botvinick, 2008; Courtney, Roth, & Sala, 2007; Fuster, 1997; Koechlin, Ody, & Kouneiher, 2003; Wood & Grafman, 2003).”
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for a Hierarchical Organization of the Prefrontal Cortex (2007, unknown): “These and other properties make hierarchical frameworks common in neural and information processing models of complex or sequential action (Cooper & Shallice, 2006; Newell, 1990; Estes, 1972; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960; Lashley, 1951; although see Botvinick, 2007; Botvinick & Plaut, 2004).”