The Application of Interrater Reliability as a Solidification Instrument in a Phenomenological Study

By J. Marques, C. Mccall. 2005

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c39c85d564fdd053a7e201ffc7c82be9d0fb7833

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Katherine L. Plant
2. Joel Olson
3. K. Walters
4. Chad McAllister
5. Neville A Stanton
6. Lynn Grinnell
7. Frank Appunn
8. Paul M. Salmon

Citations in the corpus

• Why Did the Pilots Shut Down the Wrong Engine? Explaining Errors in Context Using Schema Theory and the Perceptual Cycle Model (2012, background): “Marques and McCall (2005) provide a review of inter-rater reliability, concluding that an acceptable level of agreement can generally be defined as 80% agreement or above when reliability is calculated as the number of agreements divided by the total number of agreements and disagreements.”
• Applying Constant Comparative Method with Multiple Investigators and Inter-Coder Reliability (2016, methodology): “However, ICR checks’ usefulness in CCM analysis has been questioned (Marques & McCall, 2005).”