Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges.

By F. Cherubini, A. Strømman. Bioresource Technology, 2011

796 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The feasibility of 100% renewable electricity systems: A response to critics (2018, background): “In contrast, pumped hydro based on small dams [15,16] and bioenergy from crop residues [17,18] have low environmental impacts and so can be included in ecologically sustainable RE mixes.”
Key issues in estimating energy and greenhouse gas savings of biofuels: challenges and perspectives (2016, background): “Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), water vapours, methane (CH 4 ), sulphur hexafluoride, chlorofluorocarbons, nitrous oxide (N 2 O), hydrofluorocarbons, and perfluorocarbons are considered as major GHG contributors (Cherubini and Strømman, 2011).”
Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach (2011, background): “…et al., (2011), Azzopardi and Mutale (2010), Berkhout and Howes (1997), Byrne et al. (2007), Cerutti et al. (2010), Chaurey and Kandpal (2010), Cherubini and Strømman (2011), Dismukes et al. (2009), El-Fadel et al. (2010), Finnveden et al. (2009), Fthenakis and Kim (2010), Grossmann (2003),…”