Improved noninvasive genotyping method: application to brown bear (Ursus arctos) faeces

By E. Bellemain, P. Taberlet. 2004

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c36df7b3f07e1dd1fea35ad6dde5b69e50fa6cab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. P. Taberlet
2. Jon E. Swenson
3. E. Bellemain
4. L. Waits
5. D. Paetkau
6. David A. Tallmon
7. F. Pompanon
8. Olav Drageset

In Genetics

1. P. Taberlet
2. Jon E. Swenson
3. E. Bellemain
4. L. Waits
5. D. Paetkau
6. David A. Tallmon
7. C. Brochmann
8. M. Murphy

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Jon E. Swenson
2. P. Taberlet
3. E. Bellemain
4. L. Waits
5. Andrew Robinson
6. M. Murphy
7. K. Kendall

Citations in the corpus

• Genetics and conservation of European brown bears Ursus arctos (2011, background): “Brown bear research has provided field precautions and laboratory methods to deal with these challenges (Bellemain & Taberlet 2004, Bonin et al. 2004, Piggott et al. 2004, Murphy et al. 2007, De Barba & Waits 2009).”
• NONINVASIVE GENETIC SAMPLING TOOLS FOR WILDLIFE BIOLOGISTS: A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACCURATE DATA COLLECTION (2005, background): “Recently developed PCR preamplification protocols pro- vide great promise for decreasing error rates and increasing success rates from NGS sources (Belle- main and Taberlet 2004, Piggott et al. 2004).”
• The impact of time and field conditions on brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA amplification (2007, methodology): “Recent work in Scandinavia has demonstrated that under some environmental conditions, nDNA success rates for hunter-collected brown bear faecal samples can be increased to >70% (Bellemain and Taberlet 2004; Bellemain et al. 2005).”
• How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies (2004, methodology): “Six microsatellite loci (Mu10, Mu23, Mu50, Mu51, Mu59, G10L) were amplified four times following the multiplex preamplification method (Pigott et al. 2004) and the protocol described in Bellemain & Taberlet (2004).”
• Mating Strategies in Relation to Sexually Selected Infanticide in a Non‐Social Carnivore: the Brown Bear (2006, methodology): “For sex identification, we used the SRY primers described in Bellemain & Taberlet (2004).”
• An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size (2006, methodology): “Six microsatellite loci (Mu10, Mu23, Mu50, Mu51, Mu59, G10L) and one specific sex primer (SRY; Bellemain and Taberlet, 2004) were amplified using the multiplex preamplification method (Piggott et al., 2004) and following the protocol described in Bellemain and Taberlet, 2004.”
• Characterization of target nuclear DNA from faeces reduces technical issues associated with the assumptions of low-quality and quantity template (2007, background): “…and/or increase the number of PCR cycles (Ernest et al. 2000; Morin et al. 2001; Lucchini et al. 2002; Fernando et al. 2003; Frantz et al. 2003; Bellemain and Taberlet 2004; Hung et al. 2004; Maudet et al. 2004; Roon et al. 2005), which increases the probability of amplification errors such as…”
• Estimating Population Size of Elusive Animals with DNA from Hunter‐Collected Feces: Four Methods for Brown Bears (2005, methodology): “For sex identification, we used newly defined sex primers (Bellemain & Taberlet 2004).”